Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "unexpected EOF" messages

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Date: 2012-05-03 12:36:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Would we consider adding such a switch (it should be easy enough to
>> > do), or do we want to push this off to the mythical "let's improve the
>> > logging subsystem" project that might eventually materialize if we're
>> > lucky? Meaning - would people object to such a switch?
>> Yes, if the new parameter allows a generic filter on multiple
>> user-specified message types.
> Are you answering the "Would we consider" or the "would people object"?

Oh, nice catch - I guess my phrasing of those two questions was really stupid :)

 Magnus Hagander

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2012-05-03 12:46:57
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Previous:From: Vik ReykjaDate: 2012-05-03 12:34:01
Subject: Re: "unexpected EOF" messages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group