From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Links to binaries in news item |
Date: | 2011-12-05 16:38:24 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwvbSky3xEUhmgDiyduJmrm4BkB2aEJnAMZnzbvv0FjkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
2011/12/5 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:
> On 12/5/11 6:17 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> I noticed that we have a link to "Binary Packages" in the news item, but
>> it only points to Solaris packages. As you know, we are no longer
>> uploading RPMs to FTP site.
>>
>> So, given that we already give link to main download area, we can either
>> remove that link, or add "Linux packages:" or such link, so
>> that .rpm, .deb and other users can go to the right page.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I think you're right, we should probably change the list of links we
> supply. However, give our current directory structure, I'm at a loss on
> how to supply a set of links which shows all the platforms we support
> without it being more than a 6-item list. Thoughts?
We already link to the download page. Why do we need another link in
the first place? Seems the "remove" one seems reasonable? Maybe just a
clarification that the main download page contains binaries?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-12-05 16:39:02 | Re: Where did the Developer docs go? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-05 16:36:30 | Re: Where did the Developer docs go? |