Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
Date: 2023-06-30 22:13:26
Message-ID: CABUevEwWnkGO-dBE1a4yVQx-C5K5Rn3-55otoa1Hun47-HxO_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:43 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 05:40:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Might be worth asking on pgsql-general whether anyone knows of
> > active use of this feature. If not, I'm good with killing it.
>
> Will do.

Strong +1 from here for removing it, assuming you don't find a bunch
of users on -general who are using it. Having never come across one
myself, I think it's unlikely, but I agree it's good to ask.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2023-06-30 22:18:03 Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption?
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-06-30 22:09:12 Re: Extension Enhancement: Buffer Invalidation in pg_buffercache