Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Where did the Developer docs go?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Where did the Developer docs go?
Date: 2011-12-08 18:38:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 16:59, Jonathan S. Katz
<jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 20:53, Jonathan S. Katz
>> <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> wrote:
>>> One thing raised on IRC:
>>> Going
>>> to will
>>> actually redirect just to the index,
>>> i.e.
>>> If all the URLs map 1-1 should we setup a rewrite rule?
>> It can be done. It was not done for two reasons:
>> 1) then people will never update their bookmarks ;)
> Unfortunately neither will Google or the other search engines, or blog posts linking to a feature in the development docs. (i.e. search "site:" to see indexed pages) - from the user experience side that would be a bit frustrating.
> Granted it's not like it's the stable docs where we do need that permanence, but I do think it's wise to make it easy for new users to find information, even if it means a few people do not update their bookmarks.

Ok, I've added a redirect for this. Hopefully it is correct...

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Jonathan S. KatzDate: 2011-12-08 18:53:54
Subject: Re: Where did the Developer docs go?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-12-08 05:40:54
Subject: Re: Email delivery status failure message

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group