Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-03-27 09:24:34
Message-ID: CABOikdN9NXBjLNPpuxtsgH6V6AFnqiBbWEa8n2YBZDwFB6a7+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
>>
> Revised patches are attached.
>

Hmm.. for some reason check_keywords.pl wasn't failing in my development
environment. Or to be precise, it failed once and then almost magically got
fixed.. still a mystery to me. Anyways, I think a change in gram.y will be
necessary to make 0007 compile. Attaching the entire set again, with just
0007 fixed.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0007_vacuum_enhancements_v21.patch application/octet-stream 56.1 KB
0005_warm_updates_v21.patch application/octet-stream 253.1 KB
0006_warm_taptests_v21.patch application/octet-stream 19.1 KB
0004_freeup_3bits_ip_posid_v21.patch application/octet-stream 6.6 KB
0003_clear_ip_posid_blkid_refs_v21.patch application/octet-stream 11.0 KB
0002_track_root_lp_v21.patch application/octet-stream 38.4 KB
0001_interesting_attrs_v21.patch application/octet-stream 12.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-27 09:26:01 Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-03-27 09:14:12 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)