Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?
Date: 2015-08-26 07:51:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTvXdz_6j7PZU2nrfjtRpY6vtHKT+5jzhjJd-kAaDNPKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [blah]
>
> fixed

Moved to next CF 2015-09.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-08-26 07:58:23 Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-26 07:48:56 Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1