Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date: 2014-12-12 01:31:33
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTHL5u88W9Y=WpEdRqu8h51edX82Q8egvy+K1RAtszmKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 11 December 2014 at 23:41, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Glad that things are in order now. I have nothing else left to complain
> > about with this feature. Thanks.
>
> I think you've discovered a new meaning of Ready for Committer
>
Yep. Sorry for missing so many things.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-12-12 01:35:43 Re: double vacuum in initdb
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2014-12-12 01:23:56 Re: [Bug] Duplicate results for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.