Re: Should buffer of initialization fork have a BM_PERMANENT flag

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Wang Hao <whberet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should buffer of initialization fork have a BM_PERMANENT flag
Date: 2017-03-10 22:31:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSZACCNy8FyuZBsSwsG5ZLQokNBi2+habk1onbfkQgQPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Artur Zakirov
<a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Because BM_PERMANENT is used for init forks of unlogged indexes now.

Yes, indeed.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
unlogged-flush-fix-head-v3.patch text/x-patch 8.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-03-10 22:42:08 Re: Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-03-10 22:28:20 Re: Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?