Re: Index file got removed

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, sudalai <sudalait2(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index file got removed
Date: 2016-11-24 02:34:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSS9+pVXFoW-WKp7NOep4usfR+3oDq3M3LoSdNbDmzLBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> For instance, wouldn't it change the behavior of ALTER TABLE ADD
>> PRIMARY KEY?
>
> Good point. I forgot this one.

And I just wrote a test case breaking my previous patch, please see
attached. The idea is just to use ADD CONSTRAINT foo { PRIMARY KEY |
UNIQUE } and check if default_tablespace works as expected. Perhaps
that's worth having in the test suite? There is currently no coverage
regarding for index additions done with ALTER TABLE and tablespaces.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
alter-table-add-regression.patch application/x-patch 2.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zmokdad 2016-11-24 07:58:20 BUG #14430: NPGSQL error
Previous Message 张嘉志 2016-11-24 02:28:58 Re: got some errors after upgrade poestgresql from 9.5 to 9.6