Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status
Date: 2016-01-07 23:05:04
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSPPmPpBOktvBezARYpxnFxDuGj02khqpw6N258s4vV=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Michael Paquier
>> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Michael Paquier
>> >> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >>> Attached is an updated patch.
>> >>
>> >> Forgot to update rules.out...
>> >
>> > Thanks for the update. Patch looks good to me.
>> > I marked it as ready for committer.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Messed around with it, couldn't find any fault, pushed.

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2016-01-07 23:28:02 Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-01-07 22:51:42 Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages