Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2016-07-28 07:59:15
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will
>>> not get fixed for 9.6.
>> It may make sense to add that to the list of open items for 9.6
>> instead. That's not a feature.
> So I have moved this patch to the next CF for now, and will work on
> fixing it rather soonishly as an effort to stabilize 9.6 as well as
> back-branches.

Well, not that soon at the end, but I am back on that... I have not
completely reviewed all the code yet, and the case of index relation
referring to a relation optimized with truncate is still broken, but
for now here is a rebased patch if people are interested. I am going
to get as well a TAP tests out of my pocket to ease testing.

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-wal-level-minimal-michael-1.patch text/x-patch 24.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artur Zakirov 2016-07-28 08:23:42 pg_upgrade: exit_hook_registered variable
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2016-07-28 07:47:55 Re: pg_basebackup wish list