Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date: 2015-04-30 14:14:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2/19/15 4:33 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 12:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/6/15 4:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> That said, there is a much simpler way to achieve that specific
>>>> functionality: Expose all the recovery settings as fake read-only GUC
>>>> variables.  See attached patch for an example.
>>> The commit fest app has this as the patch of record.  I don't think
>>> there is a real updated patch under consideration here.  This item
>>> should probably not be in the commit fest at all.
>> What happened to the original patch?  Regardless of what we do, keeping
>> recovery.conf the way it is can't be what we go forward with.
> There was disagreement on many of the details, and no subsequent new
> proposal.

Patch has been marked as "Returned with feedback".

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2015-04-30 15:01:01
Subject: Re: collations in shared catalogs?
Previous:From: Michael PaquierDate: 2015-04-30 14:14:09
Subject: Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group