Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps ssloptions.[ch], unless you plan to add non-option-related
> code
> >>>> there later?
> >>>
> >>> I don't think anything else than common options-related code fits in
> >>> there, so ssloptions.c makes sense to me.
> >>>
> >>>> BTW, there is no Regent code in your openssl.c, so the copyright
> >>>> statement is incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Good catch, I just blindly copied that from some other file.
> >> There have been arguments in favor and against this patch... But
> >> marking it as returned with feedback because of a lack of activity in
> >> the last couple of weeks. Feel free to update if you think that's not
> >> correct, and please move this patch to commit fest 2014-12.
> >
> > Attached is a new version that addresses the earlier feedback: renamed
> > the added *.[ch] files and removed incorrect copyright line.
> >
> > I'm moving this to the current CF.
> This patch is statuquo since the beginning of this CF, at the
> arguments are standing the same. If there is nothing happening maybe
> it would be better to mark it as returned with feedback? Thoughts?
>

I am not sure where we are moving on here, and if anybody cares much about
this patch... Hence marked as rejected. Feel free to complain...
--
Michael