|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Michael Paquier
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I think as far as that goes, we can just change to "Therefore, by default
>>> their use is restricted ...". Then I suggest adding a <caution> para
>>> after that, with wording along the lines of
>>> It is possible to GRANT use of server-side lo_import and lo_export to
>>> non-superusers, but careful consideration of the security implications
>>> is required. A malicious user of such privileges could easily parlay
>>> them into becoming superuser (for example by rewriting server
>>> configuration files), or could attack the rest of the server's file
>>> system without bothering to obtain database superuser privileges as
>>> such. Access to roles having such privilege must therefore be guarded
>>> just as carefully as access to superuser roles. Nonetheless, if use
>>> of server-side lo_import or lo_export is needed for some routine task,
>>> it's safer to use a role of this sort than full superuser privilege,
>>> as that helps to reduce the risk of damage from accidental errors.
>> +1. That seems like great language to me.
> +1. Not convinced that mentioning wrappers is worth the complication.
> Experienced admins likely already know such matters.
For archives' sake, doc improvements are committed as of 6d77652.
|Next Message||Masahiko Sawada||2017-11-15 08:21:52||Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.|
|Previous Message||高增琦||2017-11-15 08:10:18||no library dependency in Makefile?|