Re: Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
Date: 2017-10-29 11:14:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRhOP-BFda2KPHQ1uXVHXdCS_fjO76PRYbGTsbfDW8Ekw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Okay. Here is an updated patch incorporating those comments.
>
> Committed with a little wordsmithing on the documentation.

Thanks all.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-10-29 11:48:50 Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2017-10-29 10:47:58 Re: proposal: schema variables