Re: [PATCH] Refactor "if(strspn(str, ...) == strlen(str)" code

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor "if(strspn(str, ...) == strlen(str)" code
Date: 2017-01-17 06:50:29
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRdW5M=0SC=jKs=xGCEt55pyWkhfb8iBgTGDiWE8LBWRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Looking at this patch, I am not sure that it is worth worrying about.
> This is a receipt to make back-patching a bit more complicated, and it
> makes the code more complicated to understand. So I would vote for
> rejecting it and move on.

I have done so for now to make the CF move, if somebody wants to
complain feel free...
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2017-01-17 07:06:02 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-17 06:48:13 Re: increasing the default WAL segment size