| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Notice lock waits |
| Date: | 2016-10-03 03:03:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRcMj6Rbg3PTDThn-OSYjW3ka1YfOyA8VYcE6k-wzbjFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> What do you think of Jim Nasby's idea of making a settable level, rather
>> just on or off?
>
> [reading the code]
> That would be a better idea. The interface proposed, aka 2 GUCs doing
> basically the same thing is quite confusing I think. I am marking the
> patch as returned with feedback for now.
Forgot to mention that I also found myself enforcing
client_min_messages to warning to avoid annoying NOTICE messages.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 03:09:12 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Copy-editing for contrib/pg_visibility documentation. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 02:49:22 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |