Re: Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
Date: 2017-07-05 05:38:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRJgxo2A465E2Vn2=Gbnx6k5Y9u9POC_baFZRAcRU32+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: not tested
> Implements feature: not tested
> Spec compliant: not tested
> Documentation: not tested
>
> This commit only affects comments, so I'm confident it doesn't break code, though I did not run the tests.
>
> I understand that the pg_xlog directory was renamed to pg_wal (confirmed that this is in the changelog too), so the comment changes seem correct.
>
> I am marking this Ready for Committer.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Thanks for the update. This has been already committed though as of 4260c05.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Murphy 2017-07-05 05:42:28 CommitFest 2017-09 - How do I know what commit to apply patches to
Previous Message AP 2017-07-05 05:33:45 Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing