| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |
| Date: | 2016-11-12 11:43:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRJ9qouJ_J1=TEqq=umVjVOmB5-gMmk0tRnevx1GpgcEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
>> This would avoid confusion, and we expect that few people will want to use
>> this option anyway, right?
>
> Definitely a good point.
Meh. I forgot docs and --help output updates.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgdump-sync-v4.patch | application/x-patch | 13.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 12:01:20 | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 11:38:45 | Re: Shared memory estimation for postgres |