Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date: 2013-11-18 10:52:29
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRGeFS1Z5dTgs77jBmJPYx02FdK7pNFCMGHmqvXxaH49w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 11:40:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - 20131114_3_reindex_concurrently.patch, providing the core feature.
>> Patch 3 needs to have patch 2 applied first. Regression tests,
>> isolation tests and documentation are included with the patch.
>
> Have you addressed my concurrency concerns from the last version?
I have added documentation in the patch with a better explanation
about why those choices of implementation are made.
Thanks,
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
20131119_0_reindex_base.patch text/x-patch 6.6 KB
20131119_1_reindex_conc.patch text/x-patch 71.1 KB
20131119_index_drop_comments.patch text/x-patch 1.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu kommi 2013-11-18 11:16:36 Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-11-18 10:50:21 Re: Sequence Access Method WIP