| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog |
| Date: | 2017-03-21 23:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRBio+DCmU=804vXR9pWmSTwPjMoFhCZ+je_f4fqiB-qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:56 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 3/10/17 9:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/17 17:03, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>> Having something like --limit-retained-segments partially addresses
>>> it, as long as there is a way to define an automatic mode, based on
>>> statvfs() obviously.
>>
>>
>> But that is not portable/usable enough, as we have determined, I think.
>>
>> Have you looked into using inotify for implementing your use case?
>
>
> This thread has been idle for quite a while. Please respond and/or post a
> new patch by 2017-03-24 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
> "Returned with Feedback".
I have no idea what to do here, so I just marked it as returned with feedback.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-03-22 00:08:44 | Re: Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan? |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2017-03-21 23:40:51 | Re: Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requested and not yet present |