|From:||Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
>>> Also, the removal of poll_query_until from pg_rewind looks suspiciously
>>> like a copy-paste gone bad. Pardon if I'm missing something.
>> Perhaps. Do you have a suggestion regarding that? It seems to me that
>> this is more useful in TestLib.pm as-is.
> My mistake, the patch only shows some internal function being deleted
> but RewindTest.pm (obviously) imports TestLib. You're right, TestLib is
> a better place for it.
OK. Here is a new patch version. I have removed the restriction
preventing to call make_master multiple times in the same script (one
may actually want to test some stuff related to logical decoding or
FDW for example, who knows...), forcing PGHOST to always use the same
value after it has been initialized. I have added a sanity check
though, it is not possible to create a node based on a base backup if
no master are defined. This looks like a cheap insurance... I also
refactored a bit the code, using the new init_node_info to fill in the
fields of a newly-initialized node, and I removed get_free_port,
init_node, init_node_from_backup, enable_restoring and
enable_streaming from the list of routines exposed to the users, those
can be used directly with make_master, make_warm_standby and
make_hot_standby. We could add them again if need be, somebody may
want to be able to get a free port, set up a node without those
generic routines, just that it does not seem necessary now.
|Next Message||Kyotaro HORIGUCHI||2015-10-08 05:30:29||Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes|
|Previous Message||Haribabu Kommi||2015-10-08 04:45:39||Re: RLS bug in expanding security quals|