| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |
| Date: | 2017-03-23 22:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQDjBDgGgUimqnbV=4JmdF+BybLWxaY5+Den9mrZ-U-0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty
>> low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet).
>> In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no
>> practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk.
>>
>> If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong
>> objection.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks Andrew, I can see that this has been committed as 96a7128b.
I also saw that:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/75e1b6ff-c3d5-9a26-e38b-3cb22a099ff0@2ndQuadrant.com
I'll send a patch in a bit for the regression tests.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-03-23 22:04:16 | Re: [PATCH] few fts functions for jsonb |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-03-23 21:54:59 | Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files |