| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-08 11:57:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ6dQx=rf0TdZJ4Y3rL9cs_d+ueWGBHt-sobfDd0G0d4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Friday, July 8, 2016, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Fujii-san has reminded me of the fact that we do not show in \df+ the
>> parallel status of a function. The output of \df+ is already very
>> large, so I guess that any people mentally sane already use it with
>> the expanded display mode, and it may not matter adding more
>> information.
>> Thoughts about adding this piece of information?
>>
>
> Seems like a good idea to me. It's going to be useful in debugging
Okay. Here we go. I named the column for the parallel information "Parallelism".
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| psql-parallel-v1.patch | application/x-patch | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-07-08 12:14:41 | Re: Header and comments describing routines in incorrect shape in visibilitymap.c |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-07-08 11:37:23 | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |