Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Date: 2016-11-08 00:52:27
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ+fzsCGeE2dqN+275JeSGEBFSBp7Oau+tX4ckiz-=bjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> The patch does not apply, I had to change the hunk for
> src/include/common/file_utils.h.

Yes, the patch has rotten a bit because of f82ec32a. 5d58c07a has also
made the --noxxx option names appearing as --no-xxx.

> Also, compilation fails because function "pre_fsync_fname" cannot be
> resolved during linking. Is that a typo for "pre_fsync_fname" or is
> the patch incomplete?

A typo s/pre_fsync_fname/pre_sync_fname, and a mistake from me because
I did not compile with -DPG_FLUSH_DATA_WORKS to check this code.

v2 is attached, fixing those issues.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgdump-sync-v2.patch text/x-patch 13.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-08 01:33:28 Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-08 00:25:46 Re: add more NLS to bin