Re: logical replication restrictions

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication restrictions
Date: 2021-09-21 10:51:14
Message-ID: CAB-JLwas_=FGr8bXKD7K6g0=RDUFuYU71TLLGTsQ-DTRNpq1QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

No, I´m talking about that configuration you can have on standby servers
recovery_min_apply_delay = '8h'

Atenciosamente,

Em seg., 20 de set. de 2021 às 23:44, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:47 PM Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> >
> > One thing is needed and is not solved yet is delayed replication on
> logical replication. Would be interesting to document it on Restrictions
> page, right ?
> >
>
> What do you mean by delayed replication? Is it that by default we send
> the transactions at commit?
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-21 10:59:58 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2021-09-21 10:25:08 Re: psql: tab completion differs on semicolon placement