| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: jit and explain nontext |
| Date: | 2020-10-18 22:20:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvrMbS64A1kgj8C4hUaUd6n5uye7P1bJyn6zXuVq0mSwxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 08:21, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> /* don't print information if no JITing happened */
> - if (!ji || ji->created_functions == 0)
> + if (!ji || (ji->created_functions == 0 &&
> + es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT))
> return;
Isn't that comment now outdated?
I imagine something more like; /* Only show JIT details when we jitted
something or when in non-text mode */ might be better after making
that code change.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-18 23:10:06 | Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2020-10-18 21:01:00 | Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations |