Re: Non-decimal integer literals

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Date: 2022-11-23 08:56:15
Message-ID: CAApHDvqRjjQBFHi-c3MTmYrTQGArFx8-9z2vjug41JY5py32SQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 21:54, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if you'd be better off with something like:
>
> while (*ptr && isxdigit((unsigned char) *ptr))
> {
> if (unlikely(tmp & UINT64CONST(0xF000000000000000)))
> goto out_of_range;
>
> tmp = (tmp << 4) | hexlookup[(unsigned char) *ptr++];
> }

Here's a delta diff with it changed to work that way.

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
more_efficient_hex_oct_and_binary_processing.diff text/plain 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-11-23 09:00:21 Re: Operation log for major operations
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-11-23 08:54:25 Re: Non-decimal integer literals