| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans |
| Date: | 2021-03-10 23:17:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvpjc7Y424np9YwF4zsekpJQqY-NnAeWkmTuUfpmO1kNHA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 00:16, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch set no longer applies
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2569.log
>
> Can we get a rebase?
v14 should still apply. I think the problem is that the CFbot at best
can only try and apply the latest .patch files that are on the thread
in alphabetical order of the filename. The bot is likely just trying
to apply the unrelated patch that was posted since I posted v14.
I've attached the v14 version again. Hopefully, that'll make the CFbot happy.
I'm also working on another version of the patch with slightly
different planner code. I hope to reduce the additional planner
overheads a bit with it. It should arrive here in the next day or two.
David
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v14-0001-Allow-estimate_num_groups-to-pass-back-further-d.patch | text/plain | 9.1 KB |
| v14-0002-Allow-users-of-simplehash.h-to-perform-direct-de.patch | text/plain | 3.5 KB |
| v14-0003-Add-Result-Cache-executor-node.patch | text/plain | 145.0 KB |
| v14-0004-Remove-code-duplication-in-nodeResultCache.c.patch | text/plain | 5.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-10 23:24:53 | Re: libpq debug log |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-03-10 23:05:00 | Re: PROXY protocol support |