Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count

From: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Date: 2023-03-25 02:31:52
Message-ID: CAAhFRxiePdHo-XOOxX+5sVP-YS8eXNNL_Se7Sao8g7sdcGhavQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:15 PM Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> Here is my review on the v9 patch.
>
> + /* we do not prevent numerous names iterations like i=1 i=1 i=1 */
> + have_sleep = true;
>
> Why this is allowed here? I am not sure there is any reason to allow to specify
> multiple "interval" options. (I would apologize it if I missed past discussion.)
I do not know, it just seems normal to me. I've fixed this.

> postgres=# select 1 \watch interval=3 4
> \watch: incorrect interval value '4'
>
> I think it is ok, but this error message seems not user-friendly because,
> in the above example, interval values itself is correct, but it seems just
> a syntax error. I wonder it is better to use "watch interval must be specified
> only once" or such here, as the past patch.
Done.

>
> + <para>
> + If number of iterations is specified - query will be executed only
> + given number of times.
> + </para>
>
> Is it common to use "-" here? I think using comma like
> "If number of iterations is specified, "
> is natural.
Done.

Thank for the review!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Iteration-count-argument-to-psql-watch-command.patch application/octet-stream 9.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-25 02:50:50 Re: Generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-03-25 00:56:29 Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count