| From: | Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitions not Working as Expected |
| Date: | 2013-06-27 17:42:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAAcYxUfCaYbpAv-sQaNGKEVK2UZA1BtL87jM8LBd81ZomaLUuA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Well yeah. That's not really the point, though. Aside from existing code,
>> hard-coding is generally frowned upon. Our devs have been using
>> CURRENT_DATE and its ilk for over six years now.
>>
>
> Would it help to put the current_date call in a wrapper function and
> coerce it as IMMUTABLE? A quick test shows that constraint exclusion seems
> to kick in, but I can't speak intelligently about whether that is wise or
> not.
>
>
Or what about something like DATE_TRUNC("DAY", now())? Or would that run
into the same optimization/planner problems as CURRENT_DATE?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2013-06-27 18:16:00 | Re: Partitions not Working as Expected |
| Previous Message | bricklen | 2013-06-27 17:34:30 | Re: Partitions not Working as Expected |