| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |
| Date: | 2022-08-11 22:28:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmiRZMBLCKjJV43skOxiBM71P82O2KMJf-n97t4zUtdqDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:48 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> What do you think about adding a second field in ClientConnectionInfo
> for the auth method (as suggested by Michael upthread)?
Sure -- without a followup patch, it's not really tested, though.
v2 adjusts set_authn_id() to copy the auth_method over as well. It
"passes tests" but is otherwise unexercised.
Thanks,
--Jacob
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| since-v1.diff.txt | text/plain | 3.8 KB |
| v2-0001-Allow-parallel-workers-to-read-authn_id.patch | text/x-patch | 12.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Souvik Bhattacherjee | 2022-08-11 22:41:27 | Re: Reducing planning time of large IN queries on primary key / unique columns |
| Previous Message | Souvik Bhattacherjee | 2022-08-11 22:04:15 | Re: Reducing planning time of large IN queries on primary key / unique columns |