Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-08 12:40:25
Message-ID: CAAJ_b9563Mz=s=oiF=bWYYM5krg4vBasYjiJRJ1SOWLfAgp91w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:38 AM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've updated patch to use an extended hash function (Commit #
> > 81c5e46c490e2426db243eada186995da5bb0ba7) for the partitioning.
>
> Committed 0001 after noticing that Jeevan Ladhe also found that change
> convenient for default partitioning. I made a few minor cleanups;
> hopefully I didn't break anything.
>

​Thanks you.

Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.

Regards,
Amul​

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v18.patch application/octet-stream 84.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-08 13:32:59 pgsql: Add much-more-extensive TAP tests for pgbench.
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2017-09-08 12:36:03 Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down