Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Henson Choi <assam258(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2026-03-30 06:08:04
Message-ID: CAAAe_zB04zOj543y3F4Zs520a4+pkhS4DM0SORifJSFCUzCXqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Thanks a lot for testing all these cases. Anything worth including in
> the graph_table.sql?
>

These were one-time extended tests to support the patch, not a
proposal for regression test additions. I agree there's no reason to
include them in graph_table.sql -- adjacent element tests are
sufficient by induction as you noted.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alena Rybakina 2026-03-30 06:13:14 Re: Vacuum statistics
Previous Message Peter Smith 2026-03-30 05:58:15 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication