Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Date: 2018-10-16 06:51:07
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LojQBQ-0ha=cFxHgT=RoXYBAnWZuWPNfOLQ6468OZYpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:37 AM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> I've examined code in pluggable-zheap branch and EDB github [1] and I
> didn't found anything related to "delete-marking" indexes as stated on
> slide #25 of presentation [2]. So, basically contract between heap
> and indexes is remain unchanged: once you update one indexed field,
> you have to update all the others.
>

Yes, this will be the behavior for the first version.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2018-10-16 07:18:26 Re: pg11rc1 DROP INDEX: NOTICE: drop_trigger
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-10-16 06:33:17 Re: Large writable variables