Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Of course, ideally I can
>>> also start reviewing this one in the meantime. Does that make sense
>>> to you?
>>>
>>
>> You can start reviewing some of the operations like "Create Index",
>> "Insert". However, some changes are required because of change in
>> locking strategy for Vacuum. I am planning to work on rebasing it and
>> making required changes in next week.
>
> I'll review after that, since I have other things to review meanwhile.
>

Attached, please find the rebased patch attached with this e-mail.
There is no fundamental change in patch except for adapting the new
locking strategy in squeeze operation. I have done the sanity testing
of the patch with master-standby setup and Kuntal has helped me to
verify it with his wal-consistency checker patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com