| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans |
| Date: | 2020-03-31 02:46:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LTBJ=HjeSeyvH9qgfKunLqy6DRNY5TtivP5VA42L+Ebg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 8:02 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I'm curious if Tom's objection is mostly on the grounds that we should
> >> be consistent in what's displayed, or that he thinks the information
> >> is likely to be useless.
>
> > Yeah, it would be good if he clarifies his position.
>
> Some of both: it seems like these ought to be consistent, and the
> lack of complaints so far about regular index-only scans suggests
> that people don't need the info. But perhaps we ought to add
> similar info in both places.
>
Fair enough. I have marked this CF entry as RWF.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-31 03:11:49 | Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-31 02:44:19 | Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters |