| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Date: | 2024-02-28 11:20:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KJxMhUOADnhAXjShh95DV=Hh-POSo28ciH_TORQjCKbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:26 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Here is the patch which addresses the above comments. Also optimized
> the test a little bit. Now we use pg_sync_replication_slots() function
> instead of worker to test the operator-redirection using search-patch.
> This has been done to simplify the test case and reduce the added
> time.
>
I have slightly adjusted the comments in the attached, otherwise, LGTM.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Fixups-for-commit-93db6cbda0.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-02-28 11:25:19 | Re: Relation bulk write facility |
| Previous Message | Yuya Watari | 2024-02-28 11:18:18 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |