Re: WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes
Date: 2017-03-17 12:30:52
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KGsvwoBtvctxicVOK01y5G7J3=g114tbBMCnfhQTzBOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Attached is the patch that allows WAL consistency tool to mask
>>> 'LH_PAGE_HAS_DEAD_TUPLES' flag in hash index. The flag got added as a
>>> part of 'Microvacuum support for Hash index' patch . I have already
>>> tested it using Kuntal's WAL consistency tool and it works fine.
>>>
>>
>> + * unlogged. So, mask it. See _hash_kill_items(), MarkBufferDirtyHint()
>> + * for
>> details.
>> + */
>>
>> I think in above comment, a reference to _hash_kill_items is
>> sufficient. Other than that patch looks okay.
>
> Okay, I have removed the reference to MarkBufferDirtyHint() from above
> comment. Attached is the v2 version of patch.
>

Thanks, this version looks good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-03-17 12:32:31 Re: scram and \password
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-17 12:01:43 Re: scram and \password