Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Date: 2018-07-13 03:00:01
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KAp6aE-N31JxF3CvOCG_+v480fRMbReJTT9gbVHHDAAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2018-07-11 09:16:33 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2018-Jul-11, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> > Attached, please find an updated patch based on comments by Alvaro.
>> > See, if this looks okay to you guys.
>>
>> LGTM as far as my previous comments are concerned.
>
> I see Amit pushed a patch here yesterday
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=40ca70ebcc9d0bc1c02937b27c44b2766617e790
> , is there a need to keep the open item open,
>

No, I have moved the item from the open issues list. I was waiting
for the build farm, yesterday, it has shown some failure after this
commit, but it turns out to be some unrelated random failure.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey V. Lepikhov 2018-07-13 03:13:39 Re: [PATCH] Timestamp for a XLOG_BACKUP_END WAL-record
Previous Message Kato, Sho 2018-07-13 02:58:53 How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions