| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber |
| Date: | 2024-08-20 06:06:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K=hFfrB1rW5Mbd5aTGBP_yo1nKb-0jdib842Z9bTz_Dw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:26 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed analysis. I agree with your analysis that we
> > need to reset the origin information for the shutdown path to avoid it
> > being advanced incorrectly. However, the patch doesn't have sufficient
> > comments to explain why we need to reset it for both the ERROR and
> > Shutdown paths. Can we improve the comments in the patch?
> >
> > Also, for the ERROR path, can we reset the origin information in
> > apply_error_callback()?
>
> Please find v4 attached. Addressed comments in that.
>
The patch looks mostly good to me. I have slightly changed a few of
the comments in the attached. What do you think of the attached?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Don-t-advance-origin-during-apply-failure.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-08-20 06:09:49 | Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Michael Harris | 2024-08-20 05:52:12 | ANALYZE ONLY |