| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Date: | 2015-12-29 08:56:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jze_9pO9Nd9WUeBVEUbKL4yjVcrSS9u5KYizTHPZ_+Ag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> In terms of this project overall, NumLWLocks() now knows about only
> four categories of stuff: fixed lwlocks, backend locks (proc.c),
> replication slot locks, and locks needed by extensions. I think it'd
> probably be fine to move the backend locks into PGPROC directly, and
> the replication slot locks into ReplicationSlot.
>
IIdus has written a patch to move backend locks into PGPROC which
I am reviewing and will do performance tests once he responds to
my review comments and I have written a patch to move replication
slot locks into ReplicationSlot which is attached with this mail.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| replslot_iolwlock_tranche_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2015-12-29 10:41:40 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2015-12-29 05:14:42 | pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format |