Re: Logical replication timeout problem

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Date: 2023-01-25 11:25:57
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JvBO8Kr5iaQruaUGNDD8KjCjfdS=6V5xX0afQbpEZTxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:15 AM wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attach the new patch.
>

I think the patch missed to handle the case of non-transactional
messages which was previously getting handled. I have tried to address
that in the attached. Is there a reason that shouldn't be handled?
Apart from that changed a few comments. If my understanding is
correct, then we need to change the callback update_progress_txn name
as well because now it needs to handle both transactional and
non-transactional changes. How about update_progress_write? We
accordingly need to change the comments for the callback.

Additionally, I think we should have a test case to show we don't time
out because of not processing non-transactional messages. See
pgoutput_message for cases where it doesn't process the message.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-proces.patch application/octet-stream 11.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nitin Jadhav 2023-01-25 12:06:22 Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2023-01-25 11:21:11 Re: to_hex() for negative inputs