Re: assessing parallel-safety

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Looks like one of the patches I applied is newer than the one in your
list:
> > >
> > > HEAD Commit-id: 13a10c0ccd984643ef88997ac177da7c4b7e46a6
> > > parallel-mode-v9.patch
> > > assess-parallel-safety-v4.patch
> > > parallel-heap-scan.patch
> > > parallel_seqscan_v11.patch
> >
> > This patch hasn't been updated for a while, so here is a rebased
> > version now that we're hopefully mostly done making changes to
> > pg_proc.h for 9.5. parallel-mode-v10 was mostly committed, and
> > parallel-heap-scan has now been incorporated into the parallel_seqscan
> > patch. So you should now be able to test this feature by applying
> > just this patch, and the new version of the parallel seqscan patch
> > which I am given to understand that Amit will be posting pretty soon.
> >
>
> This patch again needs rebase.

Attached, find the rebased patch which can be used to review/test latest
version of parallel_seqscan patch which I am going to post in the parallel
seq. scan thread soonish.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com