Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()
Date: 2025-05-05 11:45:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J17Le_Xx4BmGXa-KubmuBaw7xRhvok7WqzsY_5heyK+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 10:27 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Additionally, shall we try to reproduce this case for parallel apply workers?
>
> I noticed this issue while reading the code, so I haven't actually reproduced it.
> Are you saying it's not possible to reproduce this in practice?
>

No, the idea was that if we are changing the code, it is better to
test it via a testcase instead of changing based on assumptions.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-05-05 12:35:15 Re: fixing CREATEROLE
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-05-05 11:41:17 Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path