| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing |
| Date: | 2021-11-25 03:30:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+Y_9dgp8ZtadUb53FtOLsk3BZPRJSYcmmkcSqT_yYG_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:46 PM John Naylor
<john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for
> > > this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel
> > > vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea?
> > >
> >
> > No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to
> > write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and
> > push.
>
> I set this "committed" in the CF app.
>
Thanks!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-11-25 03:30:27 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2021-11-25 03:26:30 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |