Re: Review: GiST support for UUIDs

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Review: GiST support for UUIDs
Date: 2016-06-20 05:29:43
Message-ID: CA+renyVWH2NMWejxDLxMeTeC2cdazKfDsGLHohYs6r-XDeY-Qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/25/2015 03:23 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev wrote:
>> Thank you for review. Fixed.
> Just wanted to follow up on this and see about getting it added to the next
> commitfest. It looks like Iluds's latest patch (btree_gist_uuid_5.patch)
> doesn't appear on the commitfest page here:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/332/

I took the btree_gist_uuid_5.patch file from Ildus and updated it so
it would apply on the latest commit. My version is attached as
btree_gist_uuid_6.patch. Since Tom recently changed the SQL signatures
of a few functions (gbt_*_union and gbt_*_same), I did the same with
the new uuid functions. I'd love to see this get accepted next time
around (in September it looks like)!

Thanks,
Paul

Attachment Content-Type Size
btree_gist_uuid_6.patch application/octet-stream 123.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-06-20 06:18:56 Actuall row count of Parallel Seq Scan in EXPLAIN ANALYZE .
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-06-20 05:26:04 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered