Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS
Date: 2026-03-10 16:31:58
Message-ID: CA+renyULvsvgOKXSdrnbySKOzhQGBPbur0vCZ-Kpw3ZE_yge6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 12:42 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> V4 looks good to me.

Thanks for taking a look!

> One minor question regarding comments in transformIndexConstraint:
> /*
> * The WITHOUT OVERLAPS part (if any) must be a range or
> * multirange type.
> */
>
> Should we change it to:
>
> /*
> * The WITHOUT OVERLAPS part (if any) base type must be a range or
> * multirange type.
> */

Sure. Here is an updated patch. It has some comment adjustments based
on Kirill's feedback too.

Yours,

--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Add-support-for-domain-types-in-WITHOUT-OVERLAPS.patch application/octet-stream 22.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2026-03-10 16:32:30 Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2026-03-10 16:22:25 Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions