Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2017-04-07 14:49:00
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 April 2017 at 21:26, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Also I was wondering do we need this code in array_subscript_parse()? I
> haven't understood the purpose of it. If it is necessary then would be
> good to add explain comment.

Well, it's necessary because `array_type` can be modified by
`transformArrayType` and we have to perform coercion again. I'm not sure if
more explanation for that is required, can you suggest something to add

> I don't understand this part of the patch. Why is it necessary to
> execute transformArrayType() second time? It was executed in
> transformContainerSubscripts().

Yes, that's my mistake, I removed one from `parse_node.c`.
Here is a new slightly improved version of the patch.

Attachment Content-Type Size
generic_type_subscription_v12.patch text/x-patch 215.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-04-07 14:56:05 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-04-07 14:03:01 Re: src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles