Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2017-12-04 00:26:22
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 December 2017 at 06:34, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Documentation in patch 4 has conflicts. Please rebase. I am moving
> this patch to next CF with "waiting on author".

Thanks for noticing. Here is the rebased version (the conflict itself was
trivial, but I also cleaned up functions signature a bit).

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Base-implementation-of-subscripting-mechanism-v2.patch application/octet-stream 168.2 KB
0002-Subscripting-for-array-v2.patch application/octet-stream 12.9 KB
0003-Subscripting-for-jsonb-v2.patch application/octet-stream 32.5 KB
0004-Subscripting-documentation-v2.patch application/octet-stream 21.3 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-12-04 00:27:23 Re: Bitmap scan is undercosted? - boolean correlation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-12-03 23:55:55 Do we actually need an ItemId array on nbtree pages containing fixed-width tuples?